COPYRIGHT MYTHS

In October 2009, I spoke to a group of lawyers at a construction law seminar on issues surrounding architectural copyrights.  At the end of the presentation we discussed some of the common myths regarding copyrights.  It is amazing how frequently law suits are the result of an unwitting infringer’s reliance on one or more of these myths.   Here is a partial list of some common copyright myths.  When in doubt, it is always better to consult with a legal professional experienced in copyright law.

    Copyright Myths

  • There is no copyright infringement if the plans or design are changed by 10 or 20 percent. 
  • If there is no copyright notice, a work is not protected. 
  • The copyright covers the plans, not the building. 
  • The client owns the copyright if s/he pays for the work. 
  • Only novel or unique plans and buildings are protectable. 
  • If you do not know of the copyright, you are not liable for infringement. 
  • Copyright liability is limited to the cost of the plans.
  • If it is been anonymously published on the internet, it is in the public domain.
  • Postings on social network sites (e.g., Facebook) or message boards are “fair use.”
  • If the owner emails you a copy, you can post it on the internet.
  • If you give credit to the author, you do not need permission to use his/her work.
  • If a book is out of print, it is in the public domain.
  • Using something for nonprofit educational purposes is automatically “fair use.” (factually dependent)
  • A work must be registered with the U.S. Copyright Office to obtain copyrights.
  • If you don’t charge for the work, it is not a copyright violation.
  • If you only use a small portion of a work, it is not copyright infringement.  (factually dependent)
  • If the author does not enforce the copyright, s/he loses it.
  • You can copyright or patent a name.
Below is a photograph of me presenting at the Construction Law Seminar, which was organized by the Construction Law Section of the Utah State Bar. The photograph was taken by Connie Howard using a cell phone camera.






 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 12/16/2009 10:50 AM Travis wrote:
    Perry,
    I think the subject matter of the article is very interesting, and I have run into a number of those myths myself during practice. However, if you were to provide a very brief explanation of the correct law that disproves these myths, the article would be much more useful and compelling.
    Reply to this
    1. 12/18/2009 2:38 AM Perry Clegg wrote:
      Travis, 
      Thank you for your feedback.  Good suggestion.  Maybe after the holidays when I get a moment to catch a breath I will do a follow up and do just that. 
      Perry

      Reply to this
  • 12/16/2009 10:57 PM Rajesh Ramanathan wrote:
    An interesting article indeed. Infact the myths are global in nature and are usually spread over to various subject matter of copyright. The most common being 'The client owns if he/she pays for it.
    Reply to this
  • 12/17/2009 9:25 AM Trent wrote:
    I run into people all the time who have these copyright misconceptions. They are all based on an element of truth, though, so a great follow-up post could debunk the myths and provide the true guidelines.
    Reply to this
    1. 12/18/2009 2:40 AM Perry Clegg wrote:
      Good suggestion Trent.  I may do just that after the holidays.
      Perry

      Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.